paragraph about Lionel Messi

The identical song rang around the New Meadowlands Stadium the next day as Messi was carried out during the first half of the game after leaping to combat a header, colliding with 6′ 4″ United States defender Oguchi Onyewu, and landing with a swollen left eye. Almost 80,000 fans braved the cold in order to see Messi’s characteristic slalom runs, which are usually only seen on GolTV, Fox Soccer Channel, and YouTube. Fans chanted “Mes-si! Mes-si!” as he returned to the field, and he rewarded them by finishing the whole 90 minutes, running through a thicket of American shirts time after time. He received the ball in the 61st minute. He got the ball in midfield and twisted 180 degrees in mid-stride to shake midfielder Michael Bradley, then rocketed away from defender Carlos Bocanegra’s two-handed grab and bounced off forward Landon Donovan. Messi was shooting for goalkeeper Tim Howard with the ball still glued to his feet when the referee paused play to call a foul on US player Maurice Edu and award Messi a free kick beyond the US box. Last night, Lionel Messi did what Lionel Messi does best, scoring a spectacular goal in Paris Saint-2-0 Germain’s Champions League win over Manchester city. 

brake the fake part 2: anti-COVID pills work well against omicron, but antibody drugs are less effective

this article claims that an anti-COVID pill will work well against omicron variant but antibody drugs are less effective.

SOURCE CHECKING:

first I checked the source (University of Wisconsin-Madison) to see how trustworthy they are and found there twitter page with no blue check mark.

VERIFY THE SOURCE:

I didn’t know what is “University of Wisconsin-Madison” so I did a Wikipedia search on them.

 

FACT CHECKING TOOL:

then I checked on the website snopes.com. I could not find the article on the website so I went to checking the source by searching the title with fake typed next to it.

 

CHECKING OTHER SOURCES:

then I searched any info about the topic but didn’t know which site was real so I went to twitter and typed the site “science daily “and saw that they where verified which meant the sites were reliable.

I would say this Article is reliable and true because all of the sources support the article’s information