My subject: Video Games
My own paragraph
Video games, something that most parents and people think are terrible for children. This statement can be denied by my examples and reasoning. Out of all the things we do to pass time at home, such as tv, cartoons, anime, and netflix, video games are something you interact with. Unlike tv or other networks, video games require skill and eye to to hand coordination. Not only do games require thoughts and movement, games such as animal crossing, hydrometer, and survival games teach people. These games will require the person to learn and understand. But not every game have positive feed back, games that have violence, are gory and murder, will teach people negative concepts. In conclusion I think there is better things to then games, but if there is nothing else, its your best option, since you learn and test your finger skills. With that said, video games can also be a negative impact, thus, there should be a good balance between violent games and positive games.
ChatGpt’s paragraph
Video games, often demonized for their potential negative impacts, actually offer numerous benefits to players. Firstly, they can enhance cognitive abilities such as problem-solving, spatial awareness, and strategic thinking through immersive gameplay experiences. Additionally, video games provide a platform for social interaction and collaboration, fostering friendships and teamwork, especially in multiplayer environments. Many games also promote creativity and imagination, allowing players to explore vast virtual worlds and express themselves through character customization or level design. Furthermore, gaming can serve as a stress-reliever and mood booster, offering a therapeutic escape from the stresses of daily life. Lastly, with advancements in technology, certain games are even utilized for educational purposes, teaching history, science, and other subjects in engaging ways. Thus, it’s evident that when approached responsibly, video games contribute positively to mental stimulation, social connectivity, and overall well-being.
My experience:
it was very simple, it was also user friendly, it can do many things, such as make recipes, or a tutorial for knitting. Making an account was also very simple, because they have easy access for google accounts, I will note that if your making an account, you may not be able to if too many accounts are made and the company does not have enough processors. Chatgpt was one of the most harder to access, but it was very easy to use and create a paragraph.
I think that, Ai does give some truth, but the Ai keeps referring to simple concepts, and Ai is not capable of making true connections. When the Ai says how it can be a stress reliever, its not taking account of murder games. Most teenager’s play high intense games, and mostly rage, making the Ai’s point invalid. I see that almost all the points made are somewhat true, but i think that Ai is not capable of making connects and making more profound details that a human can make. One other detail is that, every paragraph made by Ai be detected, making Ai useless for actual work.
Leaning about this made me see that, to write a paragraph, you must have actual details that you learn. Ai will not replace us humans yet because they lack the actual meaning behind something. There is many concepts that is needed to write about something specific, and Ai is unable to do such task.
I almost expected this, as I have played around with Ai before, I know the capabilities of Ai. I knew that Ai could not make connections because it searches the internet, that’s also why Ai pictures can be based on stereotypes. What I did not expect was that Ai made actual concepts, which I thought it would not be able to do. In the end, Ai is very predictable in what they give, because in the end, the Ai is only code and does not have feeling or actual thoughts.